Turning the Tables
By the Rev. Lee Woofenden
Bridgewater, Massachusetts,
January 19, 2003
Readings
2
Samuel 12:1-15 Nathan
reprimands David
The Lord sent Nathan to David.
When he came to him, he said,
"There were two men in a certain
town, one rich and the other
poor. The rich man had a very
large number of sheep and
cattle, but the poor man had
nothing except one little ewe
lamb that he had bought. He
raised it, and it grew up with
him and his children. It shared
his food, drank from his cup and
even slept in his arms. It was
like a daughter to him.
"Now a traveler came to the rich
man, but the rich man refrained
from taking one of his own sheep
or cattle to prepare a meal for
the traveler who had come to
him. Instead, he took the ewe
lamb that belonged to the poor
man and prepared it for the one
who had come to him."
David burned with anger against
the man and said to Nathan, "As
surely as the Lord lives, the
man who did this deserves to
die! He must pay for that lamb
four times over, because he did
such a thing and had no pity."
Then Nathan said to David, "You
are the man! This is what the
Lord, the God of Israel, says:
'I anointed you king over
Israel, and I delivered you from
the hand of Saul. I gave your
master's house to you, and your
master's wives into your arms. I
gave you the house of Israel and
Judah. And if all this had been
too little, I would have given
you even more. Why did you
despise the word of the Lord by
doing what is evil in his eyes?
You struck down Uriah the
Hittite with the sword and took
his wife to be your own. You
killed him with the sword of the
Ammonites. Now, therefore, the
sword shall never depart from
your house, because you despised
me and took the wife of Uriah
the Hittite to be your own.'
"This is what the Lord says:
'Out of your own household I am
going to bring calamity upon
you. Before your very eyes I
will take your wives and give
them to one who is close to you,
and he will lie with your wives
in broad daylight. You did it in
secret, but I will do this thing
in broad daylight before all
Israel.'"
Then David said to Nathan, "I
have sinned against the Lord."
Matthew 7:1-7 As you judge,
so will you be judged
"Do not judge, or you too will
be judged. For in the same way
as you judge others, you will be
judged, and with the measure you
use, it will be measured to you.
"Why do you look at the speck of
sawdust in your brother's eye,
and pay no attention to the
plank in your own eye? How can
you say to your brother, 'Let me
take the speck out of your eye,'
when all the time there is a
plank in your own eye? You
hypocrite, first take the plank
out of your own eye, and then
you will see clearly to remove
the speck from your brother's
eye."
Arcana Coelestia #9051.3 A
speck and a plank
"Seeing a speck in a brother's
eye" means seeing something
erroneous in a person's
understanding of truth. "The
plank in one's own eye" means a
huge evil that comes from false
thinking. In the inner meaning,
"wood" means goodness, and in
the opposite sense, evil. . . .
If "eye" and "plank" did not
have these meanings, would
"seeing a plank in an eye" have
any meaning at all?
Sermon
Then Nathan said to David,
"You are the man!" (2 Samuel
12:7)
After last week's sermon on
"Halfway Measures," I had
planned to offer you something a
little more cheerful this week.
However, our Bible story for
this week (as we follow the
Sunday School's lesson schedule)
simply isn't a very cheerful
one. And next week's is even
more of a downer! So you'll just
have to bear with me as we
continue in a wintry,
introspective mode for a little
while longer.
After last week's Bible story
about Saul disobeying the Lord's
commandments, Saul's situation
went from bad to worse. I won't
burden you with the whole sordid
tale. Suffice it to say that in
the end, it got so bad that
Saul, losing in battle and
impaled by the arrows of the
enemy archers, literally fell on
his own sword and killed himself
so that his enemies would not
have the glory of dealing him
the final blow.
Not long after Saul's death,
David was anointed king over the
southern region of Judah. Seven
and a half years later, he was
anointed king over the northern
region of Israel also, and thus
became king of all the
Israelites. Unlike Saul, David
was careful to follow the Lord's
commandments in everything he
did.
Well . . . almost
everything. There was that
little matter of Uriah the
Hittite. The Hittites, though
not Israelites, were friendly to
them--and had been all the way
back to the time of Abraham, who
purchased from the Hittites a
burial plot that became the
first piece of ground in the
Holy Land to be owned by the
Hebrew people (Genesis 23). In
David's day, the Hittites
apparently lived peaceably among
the Israelites. In fact, Uriah
the Hittite was a soldier in
David's army--so the Hittites
and Israelites must have been
closely allied.
The story of David and Bathsheba
that led up to today's Old
Testament reading is familiar.
One evening David was strolling
on the (flat) roof of his
palace, and looking down, saw a
beautiful woman bathing. Though
he found out that she was
married, he had her brought to
him. He slept with her, and she
became pregnant. David called
her husband Uriah back from the
front lines and tried to get him
to sleep with Bathsheba to make
it look like the child was
Uriah's. But this would have
been a violation of the
soldier's code--to take his ease
and sleep with his wife while
his fellow soldiers were on the
front lines fighting. So even
when David got Uriah drunk, he
refused to go home, but slept
near the palace. He was too
honorable a man to make a good
pawn in David's dishonorable
secret plan.
So David took more drastic
measures. He had Uriah himself
carry a letter to Joab, the
commander of the army, with
instructions that were intended
to bring about Uriah's death.
The plan worked. After the
prescribed time of mourning for
her husband, Bathsheba--who
apparently was a willing
participant in the illicit
liaison--became David's wife.
The previous chapter ends by
saying, "But the thing David had
done displeased the Lord."
The Lord sent Nathan the prophet
to skillfully induce David to
see the error of his ways by
telling a story that seemed to
be about someone else. Nathan
was barely able to finish his
story about the rich man
stealing and slaughtering the
poor man's ewe lamb to prepare a
meal for his guest. "David
burned with anger against the
man," we read. And then Nathan
spoke the famous words, "You are
the man!"
This tale of blatant sin,
involving both adultery and
murder by proxy, was the one
major lapse of David's career.
And the difference between David
and Saul is told in the simple,
single sentence spoken by David
after Nathan had reprimanded
him. Unlike Saul, who made
excuses and tried to justify
himself, David flatly admitted,
"I have sinned against the
Lord." No excuses. No
qualifications. A simple
admission that he had done wrong
in the Lord's sight. And this
was why David, unlike Saul,
could continue as king. He was
willing to see the error of his
ways, humble himself before the
Lord, and return to fully
following the Lord's
commandments.
As with all the stories of the
Bible, the story of David and
Bathsheba, and of Nathan
reprimanding David, is not
really about events long ago. It
is about what goes on within
each one of us today. As I have
said many times before, the
Bible, as God's Word, is not a
mere history book. It is a book
in which the Lord speaks to each
one of us personally, guiding
us, chastising us, correcting
us, and giving us insight into
the ways of the Lord and our own
spiritual states. If we are
willing to accept it personally,
then the Lord will speak to us,
giving us a critical message
that we need to hear if we wish
to go forward toward the kingdom
of God rather than going astray
into our own wrongful ways of
thinking, feeling, and acting.
David was willing to listen. And
though he still had to suffer
the consequences of his evil
actions, the Lord forgave him,
and continued to be with him.
Are we willing to do the same as
we look at our own lives?
In fact, this story tells a deep
psychological and spiritual
truth about each one of us. And
in our reading from the New
Testament, the Lord helps us to
see just how it does speak to
us. He asks, "Why do you look at
the speck of sawdust in your
brother's eye, and pay no
attention to the plank in your
own eye?" David pronounced swift
judgment on a man who had merely
stolen and killed his neighbor's
sheep. Yet he himself had
committed adultery and arranged
for the murder of a human
being--the woman's husband--in
order to cover his crime. He
clearly saw the speck in the eye
of his brother (the rich man in
the story), but until Nathan
pointed it out to him, he missed
the fact that there was a plank
in his own eye.
How about us? Do we have keen
eyesight to pick out the faults
of others? Are we quick to pass
judgment on them for their
offenses and their failings? It
certainly is easier to
see that speck in the eye of our
brother or sister! When we
discern and point out other
people's faults, there is no
requirement for action or for
change on our part. It's
all their problem and
their fault, and they
are the ones who have to change.
The deeper truth in the story of
Nathan's parable to David is
that when we pronounce harsh
judgment on others, we are
really pronouncing judgment on
ourselves. The Lord put it
succinctly: "Do not judge, or
you too will be judged. For in
the same way as you judge
others, you will be judged, and
with the measure you use, it
will be measured to you."
This does not mean we are to
uncritically accept everything
everyone else does. We can and
must make judgments on people's
behavior, both to protect
ourselves and those we love, and
for the good of society. The
Lord's commandment on this is
found in another passage in
which he says, "Do not judge
according to the appearance, but
make righteous judgments" (John
7:24). The judgments that we
cannot make are judgments
about a person's spiritual
state. We can and must judge
others' behavior, but we cannot
jump to the conclusion that
because their behavior is wrong,
they are spiritually evil and
are going to hell. This is the
kind of judgment that belongs to
the Lord alone.
In our New Testament reading,
the Lord is especially
addressing the kind of
judgments we make. Are we hard
on others, but easy on
ourselves? Are we quick to point
out every little flaw in the
people around us, but quick to
justify even the worst lapses on
our own part? And most of all,
do we, as David did, "burn with
anger" against those that we
perceive to have done wrong?
This "burning with anger" is a
telltale sign. Making a rational
and righteous judgment about
someone's wrong behavior is one
thing--and it is a necessary
part of our existence in human
society. But if we find
ourselves flaring up and lashing
out against the wrongs of
others, whether that flaring up
involves physical aggression
against them or merely a torrent
of angry words--or even if we
merely feel the crimson
anger boiling up within us, but
don't express it outwardly--when
that anger boils up and boils
over in us, it is a telltale
sign that there is more involved
than the wrong that the other
person has committed.
That wrong is getting into us
and burning. And it is
showing us that there is
something within ourselves that
we need to look at and deal
with. Though the act may be the
other person's act, the anger is
our anger. And though it
may not seem so at first, when
we find ourselves in the midst
of burning, semi-rational
anger, underneath it all
there is usually something
within ourselves that we are
angry at. We are simply
directing our anger outside of
us, where we have no
responsibility to deal with it.
David provides a perfect example
of this. Throughout his entire
bitter struggle with Saul, David
showed the greatest of restraint
and respect for Saul. He never
flew off the handle and lashed
out at Saul. He even had several
opportunities to kill Saul, but
he never did. He handled the
whole thing coolly and
rationally, even though Saul was
bent on David's destruction. Why
could he handle this with such
calm detachment? Because David
was a very different character
from Saul. Therefore, though he
knew that Saul's actions were
irrational and wrong, he could
take them in stride and deal
with them in a constructive way.
Not so when Nathan came to him
with the story of the rich man
who stole and kill the poor
man's one ewe lamb. In this
case, David burned with
anger--even though earlier he
had calmly dealt with Saul's
repeated attempts to murder him.
Why did he burn with anger?
Because Nathan's story was
really about David himself.
David himself was the rich
man. And his swift and harsh
judgment was driven by his own
inner, but suppressed, awareness
of his own crime and his own
sin. Saul's wrongs had nothing
to do with David, and he could
deal with them rationally. The
rich man's crime struck a little
too close to home--and David
lashed out in anger. But he was
really lashing out at himself.
How often have we done this? How
often do we continue to do this?
Perhaps when we find ourselves
really flying off the handle at
some real or perceived wrong
that someone has done, it is
time to look within our own
soul, and seek out the inner
source of that burning anger. If
we find that we are unable to
control ourselves in the face of
particular "offenses" committed
by the people around us, perhaps
it is time to take a closer look
at ourselves, and see whether we
are really angry at ourselves
for our own wrong feelings,
faulty attitudes, and hurtful
behavior.
Does this mean that what the
other person has done is not
wrong? That it's all in our
head? Maybe and maybe not. The
other person may be entirely
innocent. On the other hand, the
other person may be dead wrong.
Recall that there is a
speck in the other person's eye
in Jesus' parable. And we may
need to help that person remove
the speck from his or her eye.
We are here to help one another,
as well as to correct ourselves.
The issue here is not so much
whether the other person is
right or wrong, as it is the way
in which we respond to the other
person. Do we pronounce harsh
judgment with indignant anger in
our voice? Or do we approach the
other person with mercy and
forgiveness, and an effort to
separate the wrong from the
person? If we cannot keep our
cool and act from motives of
love, it is a telltale sign that
we have a plank in our own eye
that is in serious need of
removal.
I am reminded of a short story
by Edgar Allen Poe in which a
man is sitting by his window
looking through a telescope at a
nearby mountain. Suddenly he
sees a huge, hairy, and very
scary monster rushing
headlong-down the mountain
straight toward his house! He is
about to sound the alarm to the
household and to the whole town
when he notices that there is a
fly crawling down the other end
of the telescope.
Perhaps the plank in our own eye
is a matter of perspective.
Perhaps we have the same speck
of sawdust in our eye that our
brothers and sisters have in
theirs. We think it's "out
there," which makes it look
huge. But it's really very
close to home--right on the
pupil of our own eye. Let's work
on getting that plank--or
speck--out of our own eye first.
Amen.
|